Slow-Motion Video of ICE Murder

Notice the shooter moves himself in front of the car as the car backs up.

Such a move is prohibited by DHS rules and the Supreme Court upheld a lower court ruling that an officer positioning himself in harm's way is what the courts call "self-imposed jeopardy."

Notice the shooter had plenty of time to move out of the way, but instead positioned himself where he could take aim and fire directly towards her face, WHILE SHE WAS BACKING UP - thus the bullethole in the windshield.

A jury can clearly see the shooter put himself in front of the car instead of moving out of the way - and that's just the first shot.

Notice how the car is moving away from the shooter as the shooter fires TWO SHOTS THROUGH THE DRIVERS SIDE WINDOW, STRIKING THE DRIVER.

Clearly the shooter's intention was not to follow DHS protocol that requires a DHS officer to move out of the way of a vehicle.

Clearly the shooter's intent was to repeatedly shoot at the driver from the front AND the side through the drivers window.

Such an unauthorized act by a person acting under color of law is a violation of not only DHS policy, but a violation of state and federal homicide laws.

Further, such an act by a person acting under color of law is a violation of the driver's U.S. Constitutional rights, which is a FEDERAL CRIME UNDER USC TITLE 18, SECTION 242, DEPRIVATION OF RIGHTS UNDER COLOR OF LAW, which carries a minimum penalty of one year in a federal prison and up to life in federal prison depending upon the severity of the offense.

You probably never heard of USC TITLE 18, SEC. 242 because this federal criminal law is THE MOST IMPORTANT FEDERAL CRIMINAL LAW ON THE BOOKS, precisely because this federal law is THE REMEDY for persons acting under color of law who violate a person's U.S. Constitutional rights.

The President, Senators, House Representatives, federal, state and local officers, agents are all subject to federal criminal prosecution under USC TITLE 18, SEC. 242 precisely because all of these persons are persons acting under color of law.

Persons acting under color of law include ANY PERSON who must follow a set of local, state or federal regulations, codes or guidelines; including nursing home administrators, doctors, nurses, etc.

The problem is the bi-partisan, self-enrichment rules of the road on Capitol Hill forbid any Democrat or Republican U.S. Attorney General from charging persons acting under color of law with violating USC TITLE 18, SEC. 242 and its sister statute, Section 241 - Conspiracy to Deprive a Person's U.S. Constitutional rights.

Virtually the few times this federal criminal law has ever been used is when a police officer murders and/or severely injures a person.

USC TITLE 18, SECTION 242, Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law is THE SPECIFIC REASON why Republicans would not pass the George Floyd Act because Republicans demanded that USC TITLE 18, Sec. 242 be changed, watered down and neutered before Republicans would vote for the passage of the George Floyd Act.

The fact that you never heard of this federal criminal law and the facts associated with this federal law is evidence that Democrats and Republicans avoid mentioning this federal law precisely because state and federal lawmakers could be charged with violating this federal criminal law for violating your U.S. Const. rights.

CNN, MSNOW, FOXNEWS, legacy media outlets and even well-paid podcasters DO NOT TALK ABOUT DEMOCRATS AND REPUBLICANS' FAILURE TO ENFORCE USC TITLE 18, SEC. 242 and 241.